1 CGHC010288372026 2026:CGHC:37059 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4011 of 2026 1 - Baleshwar S/o Late Lakhpati, Aged About 68 Years R/o Village Charmar, Tehsil Gharghoda, Distt Raigarh Chhattisgarh 2 - Bansidhar S/o Lakhpati Aged About 66 Years R/o Village Charmar, Tehsil Gharghoda, Distt Raigarh Chhattisgarh 3 - Gajadhar S/o Late Lakhpati Aged About 62 Years R/o Village Charmar, Tehsil Gharghoda, Distt Raigarh Chhattisgarh --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Naya Raipur, Distt Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - The Collector, Raigarh, Distt Raigarh Chhattisgarh 3 - The Sub Divisional Officer Gharghoda, Distt. Raigarh Chhattisgarh 4 - Chintamani S/o Late Usto Aged About 70 Years R/o Village Charmar, Tehsil Gharghoda, Distt. Raigarh Chhattisgarh 5 - Shardhakar Urf Sardharam S/o Late Usto Aged About 60 Years R/o Village Charmar, Tehsil Gharghoda, Distt Raigarh Chhattisgarh --- Respondent(s) SHYNA AJAY Digitally signed by SHYNA AJAY Date: 2026.08.21 11:29:18 +0530 2 (Cause Title downloaded from CIS Periphery) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amit Sharma, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr SS Choubey, Government Advocate S B: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Bo ard 19/08/2026 1. Heard. 2. By way of this petition, the petitioners seek the following reliefs : 10.1 That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call the entire record relating to the case of the petitioner. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari and quashed the endorsement made in complaint dated 15.06.2026 passed in the complaint dated 15.06.2026 by the respondent no. 3. 10.3 Any other relief deems fit just and proper may also be passed in favour of the petitioner. 10.4 Cost of the petition may also be granted to the petitioner. 3. At the outset, learned counsel for the State submits that the relief sought in this petition cannot be granted at this stage, as no coercive steps have been taken by the concerned authorities till date. He submits that the concerned SHO has issued a memo dated 20.07.2026 to the concerned SDO stating that an enquiry is required, after which appropriate action will be taken. Hence, at 3 this stage, no order can be passed either in favour of the petitioner or against him. 4. Considering the aforesaid aspects of the matter, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the Writ Petition with liberty to the petitioner to file an appropriate petition, in case, any exigency arises in future. Ordered accordingly. 5. With the aforesaid observations, the Petition is finally disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Shyna Ajay