[2026:RJ-JP:17832] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1606/2021 1. Smt. Manju Choudhary D/o Mr. Lila Ram Choudhary W/o Shri Vikas Jat, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Village And Post Tulsipura Theekariya Virat Nagar, Jaipur, At Present R/o H.No. 129 Dhani Ramdas Wali Tulsipura, Kotputli, Jaipur. 2. Vikas Jat S/o Shri Rohitash Jat, Aged About 25 Years, R/o H.no. 129 Dhani Ramdas Wali Tulsipura, Kotputli, Jaipur. (Accused) ----Petitioners Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, Through PP 2. The Director General of Police, Police Headquarter, Lalkhoti, Jaipur. 3. The Superintendent of Police, District Jaipur Rural, Jaipur. 4. The S.H.O. Police Station Pragpura, District Jaipur. 5. Pooran S/o Shri Boduram, R/o Tulipura Police Station Pragpura District Jaipur. (Complainant) 6. Lilaram Choudhari S/o Boduram, R/o Village Tulsiram Tehsil Kotputli District Jaipur. 7. Kamla Devi W/o Shri Mahesh, R/o Village Tulsipura, Tehsil Kotputli District Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1323/2021 Vikas Kumar S/o Shri Rohitash Jat, R/o Dhani Ramdaswali Tan Tulsipura, Police Station Pragpura District Jaipur ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 28/04/2026 1. The instant misc. petition is listed before this Court in pursuance of the directions issued by the Hon’ble Apex Court in [2026:RJ-JP:17832] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-1606/2021] the case of Vijay Kumar and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan (Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 773/2026, decided on 15.01.2026), wherein the Hon’ble Apex Court observed that in various matters, interim orders have been passed in criminal revision petitions and petitions filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., as a result of which trial relating to serious offences such as murder, rape, dacoity, dowry death, etc., could not proceed and remained stalled/held up due to the passage of considerable time. 2. Directions have been issued to this Court and other High Courts to take up such like matters which are pending since long, on priority and decide the same expeditiously without deferring the hearings to subsequent dates. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that during pendency of the instant petition, the trial has concluded. Hence, under the changed circumstances, the instant petition has become infructuous. 4. Considering the above, the instant petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand dismissed. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Shivam/1-2