Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 32247 (PNJ)

DIPTI v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/24197/2026 · 2026-07-22

N S Shekhawat

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

203 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-24197-2026 Date of Decision:22.07.2026 Dipti …Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab …Respondent Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present : Mr. Gurjant Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Rana, Sr. DAG, Punjab. ***** N.S.Shekhawat J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 482 of B.N.S.S with a prayer to grant anticipatory bail to her in case FIR No.68, dated 04.04.2026, registered under Sections 331(4), 305, 3(5) of B.N.S, 2023 { corresponding Sections 457,380,34 of IPC}, registered at Police Station Sada Nakodar, District Jalandhar, Punjab 2. While granting the concession of interim anticipatory bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, the following contentions were noticed by this Court:- “It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. He has submitted that the petitioner is the labourer of the co-ac- cused, namely, Charanjit Singh, who is already behind bars. He has submitted that only being the labourer of the co-accused, the petitioner has been arrayed as an accused in the present case. He has submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents and thus, no prima facie case as alleged against the petitioner is made HITESH 2026.07.22 14:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh CRM-M-24197-2026 -2 out. He has submitted that the petitioner is ready to join the investi- gation”. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of the order dated 06.05.2026 passed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, the petitioner has joined the investigation. 4. Learned State counsel submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and is no longer required for further investigation. 5. In view of the above statement made by learned counsel for the parties, the interim order dated 06.05.2026 is made absolute. The petitioner shall continue to join the investigation, as and when called by the Investigating Officer. The petitioner shall also abide by the conditions as specified under Section 482 (2) of B.N.S.S. (N.S.SHEKHAWAT) 22.07.2026 JUDGE hitesh Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No HITESH 2026.07.22 14:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh