1 CGHC010325832019 2026:CGHC:36317 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 8350 of 2019 Smt. Himsikha Verma, W/o Roshan Deshmukh, D/o. Late Shri Ravindra Kumar Verma, Aged about 32 years, R/o Village & Post Khopli, Police Station Uttai, Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1. C.S.E.B., Through its Joint Secretary (Karmik)-II, Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Chairman, C.S.E.B. Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. Sub-General Manager (Human Resources) 2, Chhattisgarh State Electricity Holding Company Limited, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4. Chhattisgarh State Electricity Generation Company Limited, Through its Chief Engineer (Production), Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh 5. Rahul Kumar Tripathi, S/o Late Shri Pankaj Tripathi, Aged about 32 years, R/o In front of Primary School, Mudapar, SECL, Korba, Tehsil & District Korba, Chhattisgarh 6. Ajay Kumar Soni, S/o Late Shri Bharat Kumar Soni, Aged about 32 years, Working under the Office of EDBR CSPTCL, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh (At the time of death of his father 12 years 3 months 22 day) 7. Sewti Sahu, D/o late Shri Sadhuram Sahu, Aged about 32 years, Working in the Office of E.E. Meter Relay Testing Division, CSPTCL, Bhilai, District Durg, Chhattisgarh (At the time of death of father 15 years) 8. Shri T. Simhachalam, S/o Late Shri T. Ramarao, Aged about 42 years, Working in the Office of E.H.T. Maintenance, Bhilai Division, CSPTCL, Bhilai, District Durg, Chhattisgarh (At the time of death 26 years 8 months 29 days) SISTA SOMAYAJULU Digitally signed by SISTA SOMAYAJULU Date: 2026.08.14 18:03:08 +0530 2 9. Collector, Durg (Chhattisgarh) ... Respondents For Petitioner : None present. For Respondents No.1 to 4 : Dr. Veena Nair, Advocate. For Respondent No.9 : Mr. Sharad Mishra, Panel Lawyer. Single Bench:- Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 14/08/2026 1. Today, when the matter is called for hearing in two rounds, none present for the petitioner to prosecute the petition. No representation is made. Even previously also, on 27-1-2026, none present for the petitioner in two rounds. 2. In absence of representation on behalf of the petitioner, the Court has no option except to dismiss the petition. 3. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. No order as to cost(s). Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Soma