M/S SHYAM SERVICE STATION v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
WPC/6506/2024 · 2026-08-12
Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 32243 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 32243 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
CGHC010425242024
2026:CGHC:36122
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 6506 of 2024 1 - M/s Shyam Service Station Duly Registered Partnership Firm, Having Its Office At Ring Road No. 1. Changorabhata, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Represented Through Its Partner Namely Shri Prakash Joshi, Aged About 54, Son Of Late Shri B.L.Joshi, Resident Of B-2, Sector -1 Shankar Nagar, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Shri Prakash Joshi S/o Late Shri B.L. Joshi Aged About 54 Years Resident Of B-2, Sector -1 Shankar Nagar, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary Ministry Of Energy Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Capital Complex, Naya Raipur, District Raipur,
Chhattisgarh 2
- Chief
Engineer
C.S.P.D.C.L.
Raipur
(C.G.) 3 - The Superintendent Engineer Raipur Circle-1, Office Near Bsnl Office
G.E.Road,
Raipur
(C.G.) 4 - Executive Engineer C.S.P.D.C.L. Raipur Zone West, Office Of D.D.U Nagar
Raipur,
Chhattisgarh. VISHAKHA BEOHAR Digitally signed by VISHAKHA BEOHAR
2 5 - The Asst. Engineer (C.S.P.D.C.L) Office At Changorabhata, Raipur District Raipur (C.G.)
... Respondents (Cause-title taken from the Case Information System) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioners :- Ms. Kaushiki Kumari, Advocate on behalf of Mr. B.P. Sharma, Advocate For State :- Mr. Anand Dadariya, Dy. A.G. For Intervenor :- Mr. Harshit Sharma, Advocate through V.C. along with Ms. Manubha Shankar, Advocate ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SB-Hon’ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Order on Board 13.08.2026
1.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the present writ petition has become infructuous.
2. In view of the above submission, writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. sd/-
(Amitendra Kishore Prasad)
Judge Vishakha