Mr. Godwin Vinod Rajkumar, v. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (ST),
WP/20421/2026 · 2026-06-11
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 32232 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 32232 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
WP No. 20421 of 2026 __________ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 11.06.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY WP No. 20421 of 2026 and WMP Nos. 21926 and 21927 of 2026 Mr. Godwin Vinod Rajkumar, No.8/24, Pattammal Street, Ambattur, Tiruvallur,Tamil Nadu 600 053 ..Petitioner Vs
1. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (ST), GST Appeal-I, Greams Road, Chennai 600 006
2. The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer II Ambattur Assessment Circle,3rd Floor, Room No.322, Integrated Building for Commercial taxes and Registration Department, Nandanam,Chennai – 35.
3. The Assistant Commissioner, Ambattur Assessment Circle,3rd Floor, Room No.322, Integrated Building for Commercial Taxes and Registration Department, Nandanam,Chennai – 35.
4. The Branch Manager, State Bank of India,No.199, MTH Road,Padi,Chennai, Tiruvallur – 600 050. ..Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of certiorari calling for the records relating to the impugned
order dated 04.12.2025, passed by the 2nd Respondent in Reference No. ZD331225059483G GSTIN. 33BBOPG5142D3ZY and quash the same. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 20421 of 2026 __________ For Petitioner: Mr.Kumar S For Respondents: Ms.Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran, Government Counsel (Tax)
ORDER An order dated 04.12.2025 is assailed primarily on the ground of breach of principles of natural justice.
2. Ms.Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran, learned Government Counsel (Tax), accepts notice for the respondents.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that already certain amount was recovered towards tax dues. Subject to adjustment thereof, he submits that the petitioner agrees to remit 25% of the disputed tax demand under the impugned order. An endorsement to that effect is made on the bundle.
4. Subject to the remittance of 25% of the disputed tax demand, as agreed to, after verifying and giving credit to the amount recovered earlier, within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded for re-
consideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within three months from the date of the petitioner complying with the conditional order. In view of the impugned
order being set aside, the attachment, if any, of the bank account of the petitioner shall stand raised. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 20421 of 2026 __________
5. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 11.06.2026 Index: Yes/No Neutral Citation: Yes/No mmi To
1. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (ST), GST Appeal-I, Greams Road, Chennai 600 006.
2. The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer II Ambattur Assessment Circle,3rd Floor, Room No.322, Integrated Building for Commercial taxes and Registration Department, Nandanam,Chennai
3. The Assistant Commissioner Ambattur Assessment Circle,3rd Floor, Room No.322, Integrated Building for Commercial taxes and Registration Department, Nandanam,Chennai
4. The Branch Manager , State Bank of India,No.199, MTH Road,Padi,Chennai, Tiruvallur https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 20421 of 2026 __________ SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY J. mmi WP No. 20421 of 2026 11.06.2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis