1 CGHC010293582021 2026:CGHC:34328 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 665 of 2021 1 - Thakur Prasad Singh S/o Pawan Singh, Aged About 25 Years Occupation Driver, R/o Village Katgodi, Police Station And Tahsil Sonhat, District Koriya Chhattisgarh. ... Appellant versus 1 - Kumbhanarayan S/o Maheshwar Singh, Aged About 45 Years Caste Gond Occupation Cultivation, R/o Village Labji Post Katgodi Police Station And Tahsil Sonhat, District Koriya Chhattisgarh.............Claimant. 2 - Smt. Sushila W/o Kumbhanarayan, Aged About 40 Years Occupation House Wife R/o Village Labji Post Katgodi Police Station And Tahsil Sonhat, District Koriya Chhattisgarh.............Claimant. 3 - Budeshwar Kumar S/o Kumbhanarayan, Aged About 16 Years Minor Through His Guardian Mother Smt. Sushila W/o Kumbhanarayan, R/o Village Labji Post Katgodi Police Station And Tahsil Sonhat, District Koriya Chhattisgarh.............Claimant. 4 - Rameshwar S/o Kumbhanarayan, Aged About 14 Years Minor Through His Guardian Mother Smt. Sushila W/o Kumbhanarayan, R/o Village Labji Post Katgodi Police Station And Tahsil Sonhat, District Koriya Chhattisgarh.............Claimant. 5 - Sarpanch Gram Panchayat Katgodi Ramkumar Singh S/o Pawan Singh Aged About 45 Years, R/o Village Katgodi, Police Station And Tahsil Sonhat, District Koriya (Chhattisgarh).......(Res.No. 5 Is Sarpanch Of Village Katgodi Who Called The Tanker). 6 - Assistant Engineer, Public Health Engineering Department Block Baikunthpur, District Koriya (Chhattisgarh).........Owner And Possession Holder Of The Tanker. Digitally signed by HEERA LAL SAHU Date: 2026.08.05 17:25:34 +0530 2 7 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector Koriya (Chhattisgarh)..........Owner And Possession Holder Of The Tanker. ... Respondents For Appellant : None. For Respondent No. 7 : Ms. Deepa Singh, P.L. For Respondents No.1, 3 to 5 : None. For Respondent No. 6 : None. Respondent No. 2 : Died. Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal Order on Board 05/08/2026 1. No one appeared on behalf of the appellant even in the second round. It appears that the appellant is not interested in this case. 2. In the absence of any representation on behalf of the appellant, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly, the instant appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge H.L. Sahu