M/s.Sri Nav Visw Ratna Industries v. Commission Tax Officer
WP/19778/2026 · 2026-06-09
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 32221 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 32221 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
W.P.No.19778 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09.06.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY W.P.No.19778 of 2026 and W.M.P.Nos.21087 and 21090 of 2026 M/s.Sri Nav Visw Ratna Industries, Represented by its Proprietor Manish Jain, No. 75, Kathivakkam High Road, Korukkupet, Chennai – 600 042. ..Petitioner Vs The Commercial Tax Officer, Washermenpet Assessment Circle, Commercial Tax Office Complex, No.1275/3, Bridge Road, Vepery, Chennai – 600 003. ..Respondent Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying for issuance of writ of certiorari calling for records relating to the impugned
order Form DRC-07 bearing Reference No.ZD330225235828B dated 24.02.2025
along
with
the
detailed
order
GSTIN: 33ASBPM1823C1ZF/2020-21 dated 24.02.2025 passed by the respondent and quash the same. For Petitioner : Ms.K.Aarthy For Respondent : Ms.Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran, Government Counsel (Tax) O R D E R An order imposing both late fee and penalty for non-filing of annual returns is assailed in this writ petition. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.19778 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 3
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this Court held in M/s.Kandan Hardware Mart rep. By its Proprietor E.Palani vs. The Assistant Commissioner (ST) (FAC), Park Town Assessment Circle, Chennai – 600 003 [(2026) 38 Centax 332 (Mad.)] that general penalty cannot be imposed after imposing a late fee.
3. On perusal of the impugned order, it is noticeable that late fee has been imposed for the period of delay of 995 days. No case is made out to interfere with the imposition of late fee. As regards penalty, as contended by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court held in Kandan Hardware that general penalty under Section 125 of the applicable GST enactments cannot be imposed after imposing a late fee. Following the said position, the impugned order is set aside only insofar as it pertains to imposition of penalty.
4. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 09.06.2026 Index: Yes/No Neutral Citation: Yes/No mmi To The Commercial Tax Officer, Washermenpet Assessment Circle, Commercial Tax Office Complex, No.1275/3, Bridge Road, Vepery, Chennai – 600 003. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.19778 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 3 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. mmi W.P.No.19778 of 2026 09.06.2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis