- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010438022022 NC: 2026:KHC:39092 WP No. 19260 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO. 19260 OF 2022 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SRI M V MURALIDHAR S/O SRI P. VENKATANARASIMHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, R/AT NO.589, 3RD MAIN, OPP. SANKEY TANK, UPPER PALACE ORCHARDS, SADASHIVANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 080. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ASHWIN JOYSTON KUTINHA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. M/S ABSOLUTE BUILT CONCEPT PVT. LTD. A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF COMPANIES ACT, 1956, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.23, AND M 24, SUNRISE LAYOUT, BEHIND JC INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, YELACHENAHALLI, KANAKAPURA ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 062. REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, SRI.G.R. SESHAGIRI KASHYAP, S/O G.A. RAMACHANDRA RAO. Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010438022022 NC: 2026:KHC:39092 WP No. 19260 of 2022 2. SMT PADMA MURALIDHAR W/O SRI M V MURALIDHAR, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, R/AT NO.589, 3RD MAIN, OPP. SANKEY TANK, UPPER PALACE ORCHARDS, SADASHIVNAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 080. 3. THE CHIEF MANAGER CORPORATION BANK, JAYANAGAR BRANCH, BENGALURU - 560 011. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MANJUNATH G. KANDEKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1 VIDE ORDER DATED 12.12.2022, R2 AND R3 NOTICE DISPENSED WITH) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY HONBLE XXXIII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT BANGALORE IN EX.NO.1081/2021 DATED 03.09.2022 AT ANNEXURE-B. GRANT AN INTERIM ORDER TO STAY THE FURTHER PROCEEDINGS IN EX.PETITION NO.1081/2021 WHICH IS PENDING BEFORE THE HONBLE XXXIII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSION JUDGE AT BANGALORE TILL DISPOSAL OF THE ABOVE SAID PETITION. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010438022022 NC: 2026:KHC:39092 WP No. 19260 of 2022 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the petition. 2. The memo reads as under: "That the Petitioner herein begs to submit before this Hon'ble Court that the Petitioner maybe permitted to withdraw the aforementioned case in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties. Hence, the aforementioned case may be dismissed as withdrawn in the interest of justice." 3. In view of the aforesaid memo, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE SHS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 34