1 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JULY 2026 CONCILIATORS PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE G. BASAVARAJA & SRI. JAVEED S., MEMBER CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No.70/2025 (Lok Adalat No.1738/2026) BETWEEN: SHIVASWAMY M D S/O M S BASAVARAJU AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS R/AT KOPPA VILLAGE AND POST, HARANAHALLI HOBLI, PERIYAPATNA TALUK, MYSURU DIST., PIN CODE NO: 571107 ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAJU C N, ADV.) AND: TD PREMA W/O GURUMALLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/AT DODDAKAMARAVALLI VILLAGE, HARANAHALLI HOBLI, PERIYAPATNA TALUK, MYSORE, PIN CODE-570017. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. PANCHAM R. D., ADV.) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S 397 R/W 401 CR.PC (FILED U/S 438 R/W 442 BNNS) PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION PASSED IN CRL.A.NO.257/2021 BY THE VIII Digitally signed by SHASHIREKHA K Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA 2 ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSION JUDGE AT MYSORE, SITTING AT HUNSUR DATED: 09/10/2024 AND IN C.C.NO.339/2018 DATED: 09/12/2021 BY THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC PERIYAPATNA FOR THE OFFENCE P/U 138 OF N.I. ACT BY ALLOWING THIS PETITION. THIS REVISION PETITION COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED: CONCILIATION ORDER Both the parties present. Both the learned counsel representing the parties are present. The parties in this revision petition have filed Joint Memo. The same reads thus: "JOINT MEMO The CRI. RP NO. 70/2025 filed against the Judgment in Crl. Appeal No.257/2021 dated 09.10.2024 on the file of the VIII Addl. District & Sessions Judge at Mysore sitting at Hunsur and Judgment dated: 09.12.2021 passed by the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Periyapattana in CC No.339/2018 have been settled between the parties on the following terms and the same may kindly be modified as under: The Petitioner and the Respondents respectfully submit as under:- 1. At the instances of well wishers and friends of the Petitioner and Respondents, the Petitioner and the Respondent above named wants to settle the matter amicably as follows. 2. The Petitioner has deposited a sum of Rs. 2,30,000/- (Rupees Two Lakh Thirty Thousand only before the Hon'ble Trail Court and the 3 respondent has already withdrawn the same. The Petitioner has no objection for the same and shall not claim that amount from the respondent. 3. The Petitioner has agreed to pay a sum of Rs. 2,40,000/- Rupees Two Lakh Forty Thousand only) to the respondent within six months on or before 10.01.2027. 4. If the petitioner fails to pay the aforesaid amount of Rs.2,40,000/- Rupees Two Lakh Forty Thousand only) within six months on or before 10.01.2027 as agreed above, the respondent is at liberty to proceed against petitioner for recovery of Rs.2,40,000/- as provided under Section 421 and 431 of Cr.PC and also under the provisions of the code of Civil Procedure by filing the Execution Petition. Wherefore, the petitioner and respondent above named parties respectfully prays that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to pass a judgment on the above terms and conditions in the above case. Hence, the parties have compromised in terms of the above." 2. Both the parties and their advocates have affixed their signature to the Joint Memo. The contents of Joint Memo petition have been read over and explained to the parties in the language known to them. Both the parties have voluntarily accepted the terms and conditions of the Joint Memo. The same is accepted as the same is lawful. 4 3. In view of the Joint Memo and compromise recorded, the judgment of conviction dated 09th December, 2021 passed in CC.No.339 of 2018 by The Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Periyapatna which is confirmed by judgment dated 09th October, 2024 passed in Crl.A. No.257 of 2021 by the VIII Additional District and Sessions Judge at Mysore, sitting at Hunsur are set aside. Accused-Revision Petitioner is acquitted of the offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. 4. The fine amount of Rs.10,000/- deposited by the accused before the trial Court shall be refunded to the respondent-complainant, upon proper identification. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER lnn