IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. : 245 of 2026 Date of Decision: 17.04.2026 ________________________________________________________ Baryam Singh ...Petitioner Versus Nipun Jindal and anr. ...Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner :Ms. Sarita, Advocate, vice Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate. For the respondents :Mr. Piyush Agnihotri, Advocate, vice Mr. Dheeraj K. Vashisht, Advocate. Romesh Verma, Judge (oral) It is contended by learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents that the certain payments have been made to the present petitioner and the remaining grievance of the present petitioner shall be redressed in near future. Learned vice counsel for the petitioner endorses the stand of the respondents. 2. Therefore, in view of the above, the present petition is closed by granting liberty to the petitioner that, in case, his grievance 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 still remains un-addressed, he shall be at liberty to revive the present petition. 3. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. Notices are discharged. (Romesh Verma) Judge 17th April, 2026 (sushma)