1 CGHC010241042019 2026:CGHC:34139 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5405 of 2019 1 - Deependra Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Shukhlal Sharma Aged About 34 Years R/o Assistant Teacher (L.B.) Primary School Gadha, R/o Village Gadha, Police Station Barsor Tahsil Gidam District Dantewada Chhattisgarh, District : Dantewada, Chhattisgarh --- Petitioner(s) Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanandi Bhawan, Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Secretary Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development And Labour Department, Mantralaya, Mahanandi Bhawan, Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat Dantewada, District South Bastar Dantewada Chhattisgarh, District : Dantewada, Chhattisgarh 4 - Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Dantewada, District South Bastar Dantewada Chhattisgarh, District : Dantewada, Chhattisgarh 5 - District Education Officer Dantewada, District South Bastar Dantewada Chhattisgarh, District : Dantewada, Chhattisgarh 6 - The Collector Dantewada, District South Bastar Dantewada Chhattisgarh, District : Dantewada, Chhattisgarh 7 - Block Education Officer Block Dantewada, District South Bastar Dantewada Chhattisgarh, District : Dantewada, Chhattisgarh --- Respondent(s) [Cause-title taken from Case Information System (CIS)] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioners : Mr. Preeti Narwani Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Pranjal Shukla, Panel Lawyer ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal (Order on Board) 05.08.2026 SAIFAN KHAN Digitally signed by SAIFAN KHAN 2 1. Heard. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would make sole submission that for redressal of petitioner’s grievance, he has filed representation (Annexure-P/02) before the respondent-authority, which has not been considered and decided till date and, therefore, the same may be directed to be decided within a reasonable time. 3. Be that as it may, the concerned respondent-authority is directed to consider and decide petitioner’s pending representation (Annexure- P/02) in accordance with law within a period of 06 weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order by passing reasoned and speaking order. 4. With aforesaid observation, direction and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, both the writ petitions stands finally disposed of. sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge s@if