Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 32187 (MAD)

Valli v. The Tahsildar

WP/18951/2026 · 2026-06-08

Krishnan Ramasamy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 18951 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 08-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 18951 of 2026 1. Valli W/o. Late Mohan, Door No. 77/33(1) Brindhavan Street, West Mambalam Chennai 33 2. Ravichandran @ Ganesan S/o. Late Mohan, Door No. 77/33(1) Brindhavan Street, West Mambalam Chennai 33 ..Petitioner(s) Vs The Tahsildar Taluk office, Egmore, Spur Tank Road, M.S. Nagar, Mukta Gardens, Egmore, Chennai 31 ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to consider the petitioners representation dated 30.12.2025 and consequently direct the respondent to issue patta in favour of the petitioners in respect of Town Survey No. 25(1) situated at Brindhavan Street, Puliyur Village, West Mambalam, Chennai 33 within a time frame to be fixed by this Honble court For Petitioner(s): Mr.Nagarajan B For Respondent(s): Mr.M.Guruprasad, Govt’s counsel https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 18951 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 ORDER This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 30.12.2025. 2. Mr.M.Guruprasad, learned Government's counsel, takes notice on behalf of the respondents. 3. By consent of the parties, the main petition is taken up for disposal in the stage of admission itself. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this case, the petitioner filed a representation dated 30.12.2025 before the respondent, requesting for issuance of patta, pertaining to the subject property, in favour of the petitioner. However, the said representation was not at all considered by the respondent till date. Hence, this petition. 5. In reply, the learned counsel for the respondent would submit that the petitioner’s representation will be disposed of within a period of 8 weeks and hence, he requests this Court to pass appropriate orders. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 18951 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 6. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondent and also perused the entire materials available on record. 7. In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Court directs the respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 30.12.2025 and after issuing notice to all the concerned parties, dispose of the same, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 10. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No cost. 08-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No nsa To The Tahsildar Taluk office, Egmore, Spur Tank Road, M.S. Nagar, Mukta Gardens, Egmore, Chennai 31 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 18951 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J. nsa WP No. 18951 of 2026 08-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis