IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5005 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-273 Year-2018 Thana- DULHIN BAZAR District- Patna ====================================================== Ravindra Kumar @ Ravindra Yadav, S/o Ganesh Yadav, Resident of Village- Kidui, P.S.- Paras Bigha, District- Jehanabad ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sheonandan Pandit, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Upendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 04-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Dulhin Bazar P.S. Case No. 273 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Section 395 of I.P.C. 3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that informant is a driver of a truck and after loading Soyabeans to the tune of 27.380 tone on a trcuk proceeded to its destination from Begusarai. When the truck reached at Pali road at that time one unknown truck bearing 12 wheels overtook and overpowered the truck of the informant. Seven persons came down and boarded in the truck of the informant, snatched his mobile and truck. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5005 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026 2/2 petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. The F.I.R. was lodged against unknown miscreants. During course of investigation, one co-accused Sudhir Kumar has given his confessional statement and the name of this petitioner has surfaced in his confessional statement. Nothing has been recovered from his possession. Save and except the confessional statement, there is nothing against him. He is languishing in judicial custody since 23.09.2025. 5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the application for bail. 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.D.J.- VI, Danapur in connection with Dulhin Bazar P.S. Case No. 273 of 2018. lata/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T