Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 32181 (KAR)

SRI.BOREGOWDA, v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,

WP/15749/2026 · 2026-08-10

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010326402026 NC: 2026:KHC:42310 WP No. 15749 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.15749 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI.BOREGOWDA, S/O. LATE NARASIMHAGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, R/AT KALASTHAVADI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, MYSURU - 570 003 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NANJUNDA SWAMY N., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, REP. BY ITS SECRETORY, VIKASA SOUDHA, DR.AMBEDKAR ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, MYSURU DISTRICT MYSURU-570 001. 3. THE ASST. COMMISSIONER, MYSURU SUB DIVISION, Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010326402026 NC: 2026:KHC:42310 WP No. 15749 of 2026 MYSURU-570 001. 4. THE THASILDAR, MYSURU TALUK, MYSURU-570 001. 5. SRI. VIJENDRA, S/O LATE CHALUVAPPA, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, R/AT NO.4792, SHIVAJI ROAD, 5TH CROSS, N.R.MOHALLA, MYSURU-570 007. 6. SRI.ANIL KUMAR KABRA, S/O HANUMAN PRASAD KABRA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/AT NO.91, KABRA KUNJ, 14TH MAIN, 14TH CROSS, WEST OF CARD ROAD, MALLESHWARAM, BENGALURU-560 003 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B.P. RADHA, AGA FOR R1 TO R4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 28.01.2026 PASSED BY THE R2 IN REV. PET. NO. 295/2025 AT ANNEXURE-A; AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010326402026 NC: 2026:KHC:42310 WP No. 15749 of 2026 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. The petitioner in this Writ Petition is assailing the order dated 28.01.2026 in R.P.No.295/2025 (Annexure-A) passed by respondent No.2 and order dated 17.02.2025 in R.A.588/2024(Annexure-B) passed by respondent No.3. 2. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties, on careful consideration of the records would indicate that mutation has been effected based on the registered Sale Deed dated 28.08.2012. Sri. Nanjunda swamy N., learned counsel appearing for the petitioner contended by referring to the registered Sale Deed dated 28.08.2012 produced at Annexure-H that the Sale Deed has been executed by the vendor M.D. Rajagopal, however, M.D. Rajagopal died prior to the date of registration of the sale deed. In that view of the matter, as disputed questions of fact are involved in the matter, I am of the view that, no interference is called for in this Writ Petition. - 4 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010326402026 NC: 2026:KHC:42310 WP No. 15749 of 2026 3. In that view of the matter, reserving liberty to the petitioner to establish right over the property in question in a manner known to law, the Writ Petition is dismissed. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20