LOVEYANSH CHOWDHARY ALIAS LOVYANSH CHOWDHRY v. STATE OF HARYANA
CRM-M/9586/2026 · 2026-05-01
Subhas Mehla
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3218 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3218 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
206 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-9586-2026 Date of decision: 01.05.2026
LOVEYANSH CHOWDHARY ALIAS LOVYANSH CHOWDHRY ...PETITIONER
V/S
STATE OF HARYANA
...RESPONDENT
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present: Mr. Shailender Singh Baisla, Advocate and
Ms. Priya Bhati, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Surender Singh Pannu, Addl. A.G., Haryana.
**** SUBHAS MEHLA, J. (ORAL)
1.
By way of the present petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioner is seeking regular bail in case bearing FIR No.141 dated 14.11.2025 registered under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 351(2), 324(4), 309(6) and 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNS’) at Police Station Bhupani, District Faridabad.
2.
In the present matter, a compromise has been effected between the parties. Petitioner along with co-accused has approached this Court by way of filing a petition bearing CRM-M-7466-2026 (O & M) titled as ‘Prateek and others vs. State of Haryana and others’ for quashing of present FIR on the basis of compromise, which has been allowed vide order of even date.
3.
In view of the above, present petition stands disposed of as having been rendered as infructuous. MANISHA 2026.05.05 18:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-9586-2026 2
4.
The trial Court/Chief Judicial Magistrate concerned is directed to issue release warrants of the petitioner forthwith, and he be released if not required in any other case.
(SUBHAS MEHLA) May 01, 2026
JUDGE Manisha
(i) Whether speaking/reasoned
Yes/No
(ii) Whether reportable
Yes/No MANISHA 2026.05.05 18:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document