ASOMIYA PRATIDIN AND 4 ORS. v. DR MRIGEN CHOUDHURY AND ANR
I.A.(Crl.)/371/2026 · 2026-04-06
Parthivjyoti Saikia
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3217 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3217 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010071362026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/371/2026 ASOMIYA PRATIDIN AND 4 ORS.
AN ASSAMESE DAILY NEWSPAPER PUBLISHED FROM BOIRAGIMATH, CONVOY ROAD, DIST. DIBRUGARH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR, JAYANTA BARUAH.
2: SRI JAYANTA BARUAH S/O LATE DEBANANDA BARUA R/O HOUSE NO.169 SUNDERPUR R.G. BARUAH ROAD GUWAHATI P.S. GEETANAGAR DIST. KAMRUP (M).
3: SRI JATIN CHOUDHURY S/O SUKHRAM CHOUDHURY R/O DAKHIN GAON KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI DIST. KAMRUP (M).
4: SRI DHARJYA HAZARIKA S/O LATE BOGARAM HAZARIKA R/O HOUSEN O. 19 GEETANAGAR AMAR PATH GUWAHATI DIST. KAMRUP (M).
5: SRI SUJIT KR. ROY S/O LATE ARUN KUMAR ROY R/O CHIPON CHILA P.O. CHIPON CHILA P.S. CHIPON CHILA DIST. BONGAIGAO
Page No.# 2/3 VERSUS DR MRIGEN CHOUDHURY AND ANR S/O LATE MADAN MOHAN CHOUDHURY PRINCIPAL OF WOMENS COLLEGE, R/O DR BHUPEN HAZARIKA BYE LANE GELLAPUKHURI ROAD, TINSUKIA, P.O. AND P.S. TINSUKIA, DIST. TINSUKIA, ASSAM, PIN NO. 786125 2:SRI PRANAB JYOTI SARMA WILDLIFE ACTIVITIES AND SOCIAL ACTIVITIES MAIN ROAD WARD NO. 5 (OPPOSITE ASSAM SILK HOUSE) P.O. BONGAIGAON DIST. BONGAIGAON ASSAM PIN-78338 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S BORTHAKUR, MS. S KAKATI,R DEB Advocate for the Respondent : ,
Page No.# 3/3
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER 07.04.2026
Heard Mr. S. Borthakur, learned counsel appearing for the applicants. This application has been filed praying for correction of the typographical errors occured in the order dated 31.03.2026 passed by this Court in Criminal Petition No. 471/2026. In paragraph 2 of the said order, CR Case No. 22/2025 has been wrongly mentioned, whereas it should have been “CR Case No. 24/2025”. Similarly, in paragraph 6 of the said order, date 04.03.3035 has also been wrongly mentioned, whereas it should have been 04.03.2025. Further, in paragraph 7, the word “complaint” has been mentioned whereas it should have been “complainant”. Accordingly, all the errors are corrected. This order shall form a part of the order dated 31.03.2026 passed by this Court in Criminal Petition No. 471/2026. With the above corrections/modifications the interlocutory application stands disposed.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant