1 CGHC010322992026 2026:CGHC:37290 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6239 of 2026 Smt. Satyashila Meshram (Smt. S. S. Meshram) S/o Late Shri Madan Lal Meshram Aged About 61 Years Working As A G Ii, At O#ce Of The Project Administrator, Integrated Tribal Development Project, Narayanpur, District Narayanpur Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Tribal And Scheduled Caste Development, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Commissioner Tribal And Scheduled Caste Development Department, Indrawati Bhawan, Nava Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - Assistant Commissioner Tribal Development Department, District Narayanpur 4 - Collector District Narayanpur, Chhattisgarh SHOAIB ANWAR Digitally signed by SHOAIB ANWAR Date: 2026.08.20 17:14:31 +0530 2 5 - Project Administrator Integrated Tribal Development Project, District Narayanpur Chhattisgarh 6 - Joint Director Treasury, Accounts And Pension, Jagdalpur, District Bastar Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from CIS) For Petitioner(s) : Shri Jeetram Patel, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Ms. Poorva Tiwari, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board 20.08.2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already submitted a representation, which is placed on record as Annexure P/5 at page Nos. 18 and 19 of the writ petition, seeking grant of the 7rst time-bound pay scale, which has not been extended to the petitioner, although the petitioner has already been granted the second and third time-bound pay scales upon completion of 20 and 30 years of service, respectively. It is further submitted that the petitioner has submitted a representation before respondent No. 3, 3 however, the same has not been considered and decided till date. 2. Learned State counsel, on instructions, submits that the representation pending before respondent No. 3 shall be considered and decided in accordance with law within a period of two months. 3. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 3 to consider and decide the petitioner's representation (Annexure P/5) in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date of receipt of copy of this Court. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's claim. Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) JUDGE Shoaib