Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 32160 (CHH)

JAYANT CHOUDHARY v. DINESH CHOUHAN

WP227/991/2026 · 2026-08-13

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010286182026 2026:CGHC:36430 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 991 of 2026 Jayant Choudhary S/o Late Pyarelal Chaudhary Aged About 41 Years R/o Tilakpur, Tehsil- Pithora, District- Mahasamund, C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Dinesh Chouhan S/o Late Dubraj Chouhan Aged About 41 Years R/o Tilakpur, Tehsil- Pithora, District- Mahasamund, C.G. 2 - Nitendra Chouhan S/o Late Dubraj Chouhan Aged About 39 Years R/o Tilakpur, Tehsil- Pithora, District- Mahasamund, C.G. 3 - Vijendra Chouhan S/o Late Dubraj Chouhan Aged About 37 Years R/o Tilakpur, Tehsil- Pithora, District- Mahasamund, C.G. 4 - Shanti Chouhan W/o Late Dusyant , D/o Late Dubraj Chouhan Aged About 35 Years R/o Tilakpur, Tehsil- Pithora, District- Mahasamund, C.G. 5 - Kaushaliya Chouhan W/o Late Jitendra Chouhan Aged About 40 Years R/o Tilakpur, Tehsil- Pithora, District- Mahasamund, C.G. 6 - State Of Chhattisgarh Nil. 7 - Bharti Patel D/o Late Pyarelal Choudhary, W/o Shri Jayshankar Choudhary Aged About 39 Years R/o Village Kosamsara (B), Tehsil- Sonakhan, District- Balodabazar-Bhatapara, C.G. 8 - Gayatari Patel D/o Late Pyarelal Choudhary, W/o Late Ramnarayan Patel Aged About 37 Years R/o Badekravani, Tahsil And District- Sarangarh, C.G. 9 - Tarabai W/o Late Pyarelal Chaudhary R/o Village Tilakpur, Tehsil - Pithora, District- Mahasamund, C.G. (Note- Parties Made As For Application Dated 22.09.2025) ... Respondent(s) SUMIT KUMAR Digitally signed by SUMIT KUMAR Date: 2026.08.17 15:40:51 +0530 2 For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pranay Gupta, Advocate (Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J.) Order on Board 14/08/2026 1. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to repeat the same with proper pleadings and more documents. 2. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) JUDGE Sumit