Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3216 (JHR)

DILIP MAHRA @ DILIP MAHARA v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./1832/2026 · 2026-04-02

Sri Ananda Sen

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:9301 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 1832 of 2026 ----- Dilip Mahra @ Dilip Mahara, aged about 41 years, S/o Bhim Mahra, R/o Village Sagrubad, P.O. & P.S. Sarath, District Deoghar. .... Petitioner(s). Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party(s). ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Ranjan, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Tiwari, SpI. P.P. …...... 03/ 02.04.2026: This bail application has been filed under Sections 483 & 484 of BNSS, 2023 wherein, prayer has been made for grant of bail as he is in custody for allegedly committing offence punishable under Sections 111(2)(b), 111(3), 111(4), 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 66B, 66C, 66D and 84(C) of the I.T. Act. 2. Heard, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and have also gone through the impugned order. 3. Learned Spl.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. 4. There is an allegation that this petitioner along with others is committing cyber fraud by using mobile phones. The SIM Cards were obtained on the basis of forged documents. The mobile phones were used to call several persons for committing cheating. 5. Considering the aforesaid fact, I am not inclined to grant privilege of bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner in connection with Cyber P.S. Case No.165 of 2025, pending in the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Cyber Crime, Special Court, Deoghar stands rejected. 6. Accordingly, this bail application is dismissed. 7. The petitioner is at liberty to renew his prayer for grant of bail, after framing of the charge. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 2nd April, 2026 Madhav/ Uploaded on 06/04/2026