Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 32157 (CAL)

MD. RAFIQUE @ CHACHU v. SIDDHARTHA KANJILAL, WBJS, THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARI, JUDICIAL DEPT., GOVT. OF W.B. AND ANR.

CPAN/333/2026 · 2026-08-24

Apurba Sinha Ray

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

S/L 45 24.08.2026 Court No.550 SD IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CPAN 333 of 2019 In WPA 13175 of 2018 Sital Prasad De Vs. Bistu Bhowmik & Anr. Mrs. Pampa Dey (Dhabal) Ms. Sangita Banerjee … for the petitioner. 1. From the affidavit of service and track reports which are filed today, it appears that both the alleged contemnors have received the notice of contempt, but none of them appears before this Court. They are not even represented by any learned counsel. 2. It appears that they have taken the Court proceedings very lightly. 3. Let Rule of Contempt be issued against the alleged contemnors. Rule is made returnable on September 21, 2026. 4. Pendency of the contempt application will not stand in the way of the contemnor to comply with the direction passed by the Court. 5. Parties to act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Rule is drawn in a separate sheet) (Apurba Sinha Ray, J.)