124 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-22281-2026 Date of Decision :22.07.2026 SONIA KUMAR .....Petitioner VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Present : Mr. Prince Goyal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sahil R. Bakshi, AAG, Punjab. KULDEEP TIWARI, J.(Oral) 1 At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the prayer, as made through the instant writ petition by the present petitioner has been rendered infructuous, as the grievance of the petitioner already stood redressed. 2. Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. 3. All pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of accordingly. (KULDEEP TIWARI) July 22, 2026 JUDGE dharamvir Whether speaking/reasoned. : Yes/No Whether Reportable. : Yes/No DHARAM VIR 2026.07.22 15:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document