Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
CGHC010311872026
2026:CGHC:35837
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4183 of 2026 1 - Kunj Bihari Chandra S/o Hetram Chandra Aged About 42 Years R/o Village Sangitarai Tehsil And District- Raigarh, Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar, Naya
Raipur,
District-
Raipur
Chhattisgarh 2 - Rent Control Authority Raigarh, District- Raigarh Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Soni, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Shobhit Mishra, Dy. G.A.
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 13/08/2026
1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:-
“10.1 That this Hon'ble court kindly be pleased to direct the respondent No. 2 for concluding the proceeding in case no. 42/A-90(7)/2019-20 within 2 months. 10.2 Any other relief, which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper, may also be passed in favour of the RAGHVENDRA JAT Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT
2 petitioner.”
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not challenging any particular order but is seeking a direction from this Court to respondent No. 2, to conclude the proceedings in Case No. 42/A-90(7)/2019-20 within a time frame fixed by this Court.
3. Learned counsel for the State submits that in view of the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for petitioner seeking direction to respondent-authorities to conclude the proceedings in Case No. 42/A-90(7)/2019-20, he is having no objection to the limited prayer.
4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case instead of keeping this petition pending, I find it appropriate to dispose of the same at this stage directing to respondent No. 2 to conclude the proceedings in Case No. 42/A-90(7)/2019-20 in accordance with law/rules/regulations and in an objective manner as expeditiously as possible within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
6. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed anything on the merits of the case.
7. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of.
Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat