SANTANU MUKHERJEE AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR
CRR/3185/2024 · 2026-08-13
Ajay Kumar Gupta
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 32132 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 32132 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
13.08.2026 Sl.No. 33 Ct. 39 Amalranjan In The High Court at Calcutta Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction Appellate Side
CRR 3185 of 2024 With CRAN 5/2026
Santanu Mukherjee @ Shantanu Mukherjee & Anr. Vs. The State of West Bengal & Anr.
Mr. Surya Prasad Chatterjee Mr. Mohan Lall Banerjee Mr. Arjun Samanta……..for the petitioners
Mr. S. Pal…….for the opposite party no. 2
Re: CRAN 5/2026
1. A final report of mediation dated 29.07.2026 along with a Memorandum of Understanding submitted, by Setu Das Roy, learned advocate Mediator, High Court, Calcutta, in court today is taken on record.
2. Upon perusal of the record, it appears that both the parties have amicably settled their dispute and they have given their Memorandum of Understanding, duly signed by both parties wherein terms of settlement are mentioned and the same was the part of the report.
3. This instant Revisional application has been filed by the petitioners seeking quashing of proceedings pertaining to GR case no. 1694 of 2020 (GR case no. 142 of 2021) and the Chargesheet no. 498 of 2020 dated 31.12.2020 under Sections 498A/323 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 arising out of Uttarpara Police Station Case no.
2 397 of 2020 dated 11.11.2020 under Sections 498A/323/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 pending before the learned Judicial Magistrate, 3rd Court at Serampore, Hooghly.
4.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that the matter has been settled out of court between the parties and in this regard, a Memorandum of Understanding has been executed. The dispute has been resolved in full and final terms by way of a compromise. The same has been recorded in the said Memorandum of Understanding.
5.
Learned counsel for the opposite party has also conceded the same.
6. In view of the above settlement made by the parties as well as filed the Memorandum of Understanding duly signed by the parties, this Court finds that there is no impediment to dispose of this case by exercising inherent power granted to the Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
7. The impugned proceeding is hereby quashed insofar as the petitioners are concerned as there is no impediment in law.
8. CRR 3185 of 2024 is, accordingly, disposed of.
9. Consequently the application being CRAN 5/2026 is, thus, disposed of.
10. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
3
11. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court below for information.
12. All parties shall act in terms of the copy of this order downloaded from the official website of this court.
13. Urgent certified photocopy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties taking all legal formalities.
( Ajay Kumar Gupta, J. )