Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3213 (CHH)

M/S ESSAL INFRASTRCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED v. NAVA RAIPUR ATAL VIKAS PRADHIKARAN

WPC/579/2026 · 2026-02-10

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:7480-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 579 of 2026 M/s Essal Infrastrcture Private Limited Through Anand Agrawal, Director, S/o Late Jai Prakash Agrawal, R/o A-401, Maruti Solitaire, Kachana Road, Khamardih, Raipur C.G.- 492004. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Nava Raipur Atal Vikas Pradhikaran Through The Chief Executive Officer, Paryavas Bhawan, North Block, Sector- 19, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District Raipur C.G. 2 - The Chief Engineer, Nava Raipur, Atal Vikas Pradhikaran, Paryavas Bhawan, North Block, Sector- 19, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District Raipur C.G. 3 - The Executive Engineer (Civil)-III, Nava Raipur, Atal Vikas Pradhikaran, Paryavas Bhawan, North Block, Sector- 19, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District Raipur C.G. 4 - The Sub-Engineer (XI), Nava Raipur, Atal Vikas Pradhikaran, Paryavas Bhawan, North Block, Sector- 19, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District Raipur C.G. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Brajendra Singh, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr.S.S.Baghel, Government Advocate Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Mr. Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge Order on Board BABLU RAJENDRA BHANARKAR Digitally signed by BABLU RAJENDRA BHANARKAR Date: 2026.02.12 10:30:31 +0530 2 Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 11.02.2026 1. Heard Mr.Brajendra Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr.S.S.Baghel, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents/State. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India with following prayer:- “(i) To issue writ/order to allow this petition, (ii) To issue direction to the Respondent to make payment of the due amount to the petitioner within a maximum period of 120 days from the date of receipt of copy of the order of this Hon'ble Court on this writ petition, (iii) To issue direction to the Respondent to pay interest @ 6 percent per annum on the due amount of the petitioner from the date the amount fell due till the payment is actually made and (iv) To grant any further relief and cost to the petitioner as deemed fit by this Hon'ble Court.” 3. In the present case, there appears to be several defects and learned counsel for the petitioner has not cured the defects till date. 4. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to file a fresh petition curing all defects. 3 5. Permission is granted. 6. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition curing all the defects, subject to depositing a sum of Rs.2,000/- as cost by the petitioners in the Registry of this Court and the same shall be transmitted to the Government Special School for Intellectually Retarded Girls, Gangapur, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.). 7. Certified copy of the documents annexed with this petition shall be returned to the counsel for the petitioner after retaining the photocopies of the same. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Bablu