CRM-M-22812-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 331 CRM-M-22812-2026 Date of Decision:- 21.07.2026 AJAY ALIAS AMAN ……PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA .…RESPONDENT(S) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Gourav Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Diya Sodhi, Senior DAG, Haryana. **** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (Oral) On 24.04.2026, the following order was passed:- “The prayer in the present petition under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 is for quashing of the order dated 21.02.2026 (Annexure P-4) passed by the Additional Session Judge, Hisar in criminal case bearing No.146 of 2022 arising out of FIR No.504 dated 27.12.2021 under Sections 307, 148, 149, 506 of IPC and Section 25 of Arms Act, registered at Police Station Adampur, District Hisar, whereby the bail granted to the petitioner has been cancelled and bonds were forfeited to the State. The learned counsel for the petitioner contends that due to miscommunication, the petitioner was unable to appear on 21.02.2026 because of which the impugned order came to be passed. He states that the petitioner is ready and willing to join the proceedings once again. Notice of motion for 02.07.2026. In the meanwhile, the petitioner is directed to surrender before the Trial Court within a period of one week from today and subject to a deposit of Rs.25,000/- as costs with the Punjab and Haryana High Court Bar Association, KUSUM 2026.07.22 10:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC Chandigarh CRM-M-22812-2026 2 Account No.65035682434, State Bank of India, IFSC:- SBIN0050306, he shall be admitted to interim bail to the satisfaction of the Trial Court. A copy of the receipt depositing a sum of Rs.25,000/- with the aforesaid Relief Fund as well as a copy of the order granting interim bail to the petitioner be produced in the Court on the next date of hearing.” 2. In furtherance of the afore-mentioned order, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has surrendered before the Trial Court and has since been granted the concession of interim bail, and has deposited the costs imposed by this Court. 3. In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed by this Court. 4. It is expected that the petitioner shall not absent himself from trial without sufficient cause. 5. Disposed of. (JASJIT SINGH BEDI) JUDGE 21.07.2026 KUSUM Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No KUSUM 2026.07.22 10:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC Chandigarh