IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT (111) MANISH KUMAR STATE OF CORAM: Present: ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) 1. the Constitution of India seeking the issuance of a direction to official respondent No. 2 to decide the representation dated 06.07.2026 (Annexure P-4) submitted by the petitioner for the protection of his life and liberty, as well as that of his family, on account of the apprehension of false implication at the hands of respondents No. 3 to 6. 2. Inspector Daljit Singh, who is present in Court, submits that since the petitioner (Annexure P that, as of now, the petition is not required to be pursued and, in case the petitioner is required in the said F notice to him by giving at least seven days' prior notice. 3. petitioner does not press the present petition at this stage. 4. 5. liberty of its citizens. July 21, 2026 manju Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether Reportable: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH MANISH KUMAR Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN **** Ms. Harpreet Kaur, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amandeep Singh Samra, AAG, Punjab. **** ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed under the Constitution of India seeking the issuance of a direction to official respondent No. 2 to decide the representation dated 06.07.2026 (Annexure 4) submitted by the petitioner for the protection of his life and liberty, as hat of his family, on account of the apprehension of false implication at the hands of respondents No. 3 to 6. At the outset, learned State counsel, on instructions from Inspector Daljit Singh, who is present in Court, submits that since the has submitted the representation (Annexure P-4), the same is under consideration. It is further submitted that, as of now, the petition is not required to be pursued and, in case the petitioner is required in the said FIR, the police shall issue an appropriate notice to him by giving at least seven days' prior notice. In light of the above statement, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition at this stage. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as not pressed. Needless to say that the State is bound to protect the life and liberty of its citizens. , 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-8622-2026 Date of Decision:- 21.07.2026 ……Petitioner ……Respondents ALOK JAIN Ms. Harpreet Kaur, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amandeep Singh Samra, AAG, Punjab. The present petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking the issuance of a direction to official respondent No. 2 to decide the representation dated 06.07.2026 (Annexure 4) submitted by the petitioner for the protection of his life and liberty, as hat of his family, on account of the apprehension of false implication at the hands of respondents No. 3 to 6. At the outset, learned State counsel, on instructions from Inspector Daljit Singh, who is present in Court, submits that since the has submitted the representation dated 06.07.2026 , the same is under consideration. It is further submitted that, as of now, the petition is not required to be pursued and, in case the IR, the police shall issue an appropriate notice to him by giving at least seven days' prior notice. In light of the above statement, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition at this stage. ition is dismissed as not pressed. Needless to say that the State is bound to protect the life and (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE ……Petitioner ……Respondents Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking the issuance of a direction to official respondent No. 2 to decide the representation dated 06.07.2026 (Annexure 4) submitted by the petitioner for the protection of his life and liberty, as hat of his family, on account of the apprehension of false At the outset, learned State counsel, on instructions from Inspector Daljit Singh, who is present in Court, submits that since the dated 06.07.2026 , the same is under consideration. It is further submitted that, as of now, the petition is not required to be pursued and, in case the IR, the police shall issue an appropriate In light of the above statement, learned counsel for the Needless to say that the State is bound to protect the life and MANJU 2026.07.22 11:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document