- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010556432025 NC: 2026:KHC:40388 WP No. 25552 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 25552 OF 2025 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: M/S SUPREME STEEL AND CO., SANA BUILDING 1584/1, BEHIND TAJ HOTEL, B.M.ROAD, CHANNAPATNA, RAMANAGARA-562160. REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNERS, 1. SYED SAIFUDDIN, S/O. MR. SYED AHMED, 2. SYED SAMIUDDIN, S/O. SYED AHMED, PETITIONERS NO.1 AND 2 ARE RESIDING AT NO.1582, SIRAJ COMPOUND, KHINATH COLONY, CHANNAPATNA, RAMANAGARA-562160. 3. SYED NAJMUDDIN, S/O. SYED AHMED, R/AT 1582, UPPER DAIRA, KHINATH MOHALLA, CHANNAPATNA, RAMANAGARA-562160. 4. SYED ZAFARUDDIN, S/O. SYED AHMED, R/AT NO.1471, ISLAMPUR MOHALLA, Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010556432025 NC: 2026:KHC:40388 WP No. 25552 of 2025 DAIRA, CHANNAPATNA, RAMANAGARA-562160. (REGISTERED UNDER MSME, GOVT. OF INDIA) …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SADDAM R.MULLA, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. MOHAMMED TAHIR, ADVOCATE) AND: THE CHIEF MANAGER AND AUTHORIZED OFFICER KARNATAKA BANK LTD., ASSET RECOVERY MANAGEMENT BRANCH, KARNATAKA BANK BUILDING, FIRST FLOOR, WARD NO.29, MARALURU EXTENSION, SADASHIVANAGAR, TUMAKURU-572105. (REGISTERED UNDER THE INDIAN COMPANIES ACT, 2013) …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. NITHIN CHANDRA M., ADVOCATE FOR C/R) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Saddam R.Mulla, counsel on behalf of Sri.Mohammed Tahir, for the petitioner and Sri.Nithin Chandra M., counsel for the caveator / respondent appeared in person. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010556432025 NC: 2026:KHC:40388 WP No. 25552 of 2025 Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. When queried, counsel for the petitioner submits that a conscious decision is taken about the withdrawal of the petition and if an order is passed the petitioner shall not seek review of the order or modification of the order. The oral submission is placed on record. As the counsel on record has taken a conscious decision about the withdrawal of the petition, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Because of dismissal of the Writ Petition, all pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of. Sd/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21