IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 277 CRM-M-28093-2026 Date of decision: 21st July, 2026 Sudharshan Tirumala Vinjamur ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Mr. Abhimanyu Jangra, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Aditya Pal Singla, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. *** MANISHA BATRA, J (ORAL):- Report from the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gurugram, along with the reasons for the delay in deciding the application, has been received. It has further been informed that the application has since been decided. In view of the said report, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition has been rendered infructuous and may accordingly be disposed of as such. Since the main petition has already been disposed of, pending application, if any, is rendered infructuous. [MANISHA BATRA] JUDGE 21st July, 2026 Parveen Sharma 1. Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes / No 2. Whether reportable : Yes / No PARVEEN SHARMA 2026.07.22 09:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document