IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1504 of 2026 ====================================================== Khurshid Alam Son of Abdul Kalam Ansari, resident of village- Madudabad, Post Office and Police Station- Mohiuddin Nagar, District- Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Chief Engineer, Road Construction Department, N.H. Wing (North Bihar), Patna. 3. The Collector-cum-District Magistrate, District- Samastipur. 4. The District Land Acqusition Officer, Samastipur. 5. The Executive Engineer, N.H. Wing, Road Construction Department, Bihar Sharif, Nalanda. 6. The Circle Officer, Mohiuddin Nagar, District- Samastipur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Dhurjati Kumar Prasad, GP-14 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 2 31-01-2026 Heard the parties. 2. The present petition has been preferred for the grant of following relief(s): “(i) to issue a certiorari for direction to respondents to quash and set-aside the order dated 03.01.2025 passed by Land Acquisition Officer, Samastipur whereby and where under the Land Acquisition Officer has denied to grant compensation amount against the land acquired on the ground that the land is Anabad Bihar Patna High Court CWJC No.1504 of 2026(2) dt.31-01-2026 2/3 Sarkar. (ii) for direction to respondent no.4 to pay the compensation amount of the acquired land for construction of Road NH122B of the petitioner which has been demarcated appertaining to khata no.869, Thana no.182, Area 0.0668 Hectares Under N.H. 122(B) demarcated in Revenue village-Madudabad, Sub division-Patori, District-Samastipur. (iii) for directing the respondent to protect the position of the petitioner over the aforesaid land. (iv) for which pass such other order/orders, direction/directions as your lordships may deem fit in the fact and circumstances of the case and according to law.” 3. Though the petitioner want compensation of the land, the details are unavailable. On the other hand learned GP- 14 Mr. Dhurjati Kumar Prasad, has taken this Court to the order dated 03.01.2025 issued by the District Land Acquisition Officer, Samastipur by which the claim of the petitioner has been negated with respect to a land bearing Khesra No. 869 Patna High Court CWJC No.1504 of 2026(2) dt.31-01-2026 3/3 (area 0.0668 hectare) on the ground that it belongs to him, it is recorded as Anabad Bihar Sarkar. 4. In that background, this Court is of the opinion that no relief can be extended to the petitioner. However, the petitioner so want, always have the liberty to move before appropriate authority/court for the redressal of the grievance. 5. The writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid observation. vinayak/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U