92 18.08.2026 Ct. No.17 J.Das FAT 2192 of 1989 Calcutta State Transport Corporation Vs. Anil Kr. Ghosh 1. None appears on behalf of either of the parties nor is any adjournment prayed for on their behalf even in the second call. 2. This matter was appearing in the Warning List and the parties had sufficient notice that the same would be taken up for hearing. 3. In view of the non-appearance of the parties, FAT 2192 of 1989 stands dismissed for default. Interim orders, if any, stand vacated. [Ravi Krishan Kapur, J.] [Rishad Medora, J.]