AKHTER BANOO v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. (HOME AFFAIRS)
WP(C)/976/2021 · 2026-09-22
Rajesh Sekhri
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3211 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3211 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) No. 976/2021
Akhter Banoo
….. Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s)
Through: None. q
vs
Union of India and Ors. .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Bisma Ali, Advocate vice Mr. T. M. Shamsi, DSGI.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE
ORDER 22.09.2026
01. None appears for the petitioner today and same was the position on the last date of hearing and the dates preceding.
02. Learned arguing counsel for the petitioner last appeared in this case on 03.07.2024 i.e., more than two years back. Thereafter, either he was absent or was being represented by one proxy counsel or the other. It appears that petitioner is not interested in further prosecution of the petition.
03. In view of the above, present petition is dismissed for non- prosecution along with connected application(s).
04. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(Rajesh Sekhri)
Judge
Srinagar 22.09.2026 Sushant
Sr. No. 22