TIPAN MAHTO v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND, THRO ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE REGISTRATION AND LAND REFORMS DEPARTMENT
WPC/2230/2026 · 2026-04-07
Sri Ananda Sen
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3211 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3211 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:9854 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.2230 of 2026 ------ Tipan Mahto, son of late Bulaki Mahto, resident of Village Murma, P.O. + P.S. Nirsa, District Dhanbad, Jharkhand. … … Petitioner Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand, through its Secretary, Revenue Registration and Land Reforms Department, Government of Jharkhand, having its office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. Jagarnathpur, P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi.
2. Deputy Commissioner, Dhanbad, P.O. + P.S. + District Dhanbad, Jharkhand.
3. The Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Dhanbad, P.O. + P.S. + District Dhanbad, Jharkhand.
4. Circle Officer, Nirsa, P.O. + P.S. Nirsa, District Dhanbad, Jharkhand. … … Respondents ------
CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Birendra Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent(s): Mr. Aditya Raman, AC to GA-III ------
02/ 07.04.2026
By filing this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:-
“to direct the concerned respondents, especially respondent no.4 Circle Officer, Nirsa dispose of as expeditiously as possible the pending proceeding no.1276/2025-26 dated 05-10-2025, requesting for implementation/execution of order dated 29- 08-2025, passed by respondent no.3, in Mutation Appeal Case No.58.2025-26 (Annexure-2) whereby respondent no.3 has
directed respondent no.4 register the name of petitioner’s wife Smt. Janki Devi in register-II by entering new khata and new plot, in respect to lands situated at Mauza-Murma, Mauza No.57, Khata No.87 (old Khata No.164), new plot no.1660/1757 (old Plot No.1421), Total Area- 13.75 Decimal District-Dhanbad.”
2026:JHHC:9854 2
2.
Heard learned counsel representing the petitioner and
learned counsel representing the respondents.
3.
Learned counsel representing the petitioner submits that suffice it would be, if a direction is given to the respondents to dispose of the proceeding in Mutation Case No.1276/2025-26, at the earliest.
4.
Learned counsel representing the respondent – State submits that if the proceeding is pending, appropriate action will be taken to ensure disposal of the same, as early as possible, after hearing all the parties concerned.
5.
Considering the aforesaid submission, the petitioner will produce a copy of this order along with relevant documents before the concerned respondents, within three weeks.
5.1. The respondents are directed to consider the case of the petitioner and ensure disposal of the proceeding pending
consideration, within ten weeks in accordance with law, after affording opportunity of hearing to all the parties concerned.
5.2. The respondents will also communicate its decision to the petitioner.
6.
With the aforesaid direction, this writ petition stands
disposed of.
(ANANDA SEN, J.) 07th April, 2026 Prashant. Cp-2
Uploaded on 10.04.2026