Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 32097 (KAR)

SRI RANGANATHA v. SRI RAVIRAJ S KUMAR

CCC/499/2025 · 2026-08-19

Jayant Banerji, Tara Vitasta Ganju

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010291812025 NC: 2026:KHC:44760-DB CCC No. 499 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI AND THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 499 OF 2025 BETWEEN: SRI. RANGANATHA S/O. MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/AT. KADE MANE, 1ST A CROSS, BEHIND VIVEKA VIDHYALAYA, SRI. SHIVAKUMARASWAMY LAYOUT, ANDRAHALLI MAIN ROAD, TIGALARAPALYA, BENGALURU-560 058. …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI. DEEPAK.M., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. RAVIRAJ.S.KUMAR S/O. M.SHIVAKUMAR ALIAS MEGADAHALLI DR.SHIVAKUMAR, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 41, 3RD CROSS, AKSHAYA NAGAR EAST, YELENAHALLI MAIN ROAD, BEGUR, BENGALURU-560 068. 2. SRI. M.SHIVAKUMAR ALIAS MEGADAHALLI DR SHIVAKUMAR, S/O. LATE MAHADEVIAH, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.41, 3RD CROSS, Digitally signed by SUMATHY KANNAN Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010291812025 NC: 2026:KHC:44760-DB CCC No. 499 of 2025 AKSHAYA NAGAR EAST, YELENAHALLI MAIN ROAD, BEGUR, BENGALURU-560 068. …ACCUSED (ACCUSED NOS.1 & 2 ARE SERVED) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 10 & 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS, ACT, 1971, BY THE COMPLAINANT, WHEREIN PRAYS THAT THE HON’BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO INITIATE APPROPRIATE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED PERSONS FOR WILFUL DISOBEDIENCE OF THE COMPROMISE DECREE AND ORDER DATED 21.04.2023 PASSED IN O.S.NO.2510/2023 HON’BLE CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, CCH-18 AND PUNISH THE ACCUSED PERSONS ACCORDING TO LAW. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI & HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI) A compromise decree and order dated 21.04.2023 is stated to have been produced. However, from the record it appears that the compromise decree has not been produced. Thus, there is no decree of the Court before us. 2. Be that as it may, if the compromise decree does exist, it may be executable. Non-compliance by a - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010291812025 NC: 2026:KHC:44760-DB CCC No. 499 of 2025 party to the compromise agreement would not give rise to a cause for initiating contempt proceedings. 2. There is no cause for interference in this petition. It is accordingly consigned. Sd/- (JAYANT BANERJI) JUDGE Sd/- (TARA VITASTA GANJU) JUDGE KS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 16