Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3209 (KAR)

MR. RAMESH KUMAR. Y v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/1276/2019 · 2026-04-15

R Nataraj

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20373 CRL.P No. 1276 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 1276 OF 2019 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. MR. RAMESH KUMAR. Y S/O YELLAPPA R AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, NOW R/AT IGGALURU VILLAGE, ATTIBELE HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK BANGALORE DISTRICT - 562 107. 2. SMT. SWATHI. R. KUMAR @ SWATHI AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, W/O RAMESH KUMAR Y NOW R/AT IGGALURU VILLAGE, ATTIBELE HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BANGALORE DISTRICT - 562 107. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. RAVI L VAIDYA, ADVOCATE (THROUGH V/C)) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY SURYANAGAR POLICE STATION, BANGALORE. REP BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. M/S SURAKSHA CAR CARE PRIVATE LTD., HAVING ITS OFFICE AT 30/3 HOSUR MAIN ROAD, Digitally signed by HEMALATHA J Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20373 CRL.P No. 1276 of 2019 ELECTRONIC CITY BANGALORE - 560 100 REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR SUDHAKAR H.R., …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. RAJATH SUBRAMANYAM, HCGP) THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 PRAYING THAT TO QUASH THE ENTIRE CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS INITIATED AGAINST THE PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1 AND 2 FOR AN OFFENCES P/U/S 406, 420, 468 AND 506 R/W 34 OF IPC PENDING ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C., ANEKAL IN C.C.NO.1781/2018 (CRIME NO.40/2016 OF 1ST RESPONDENT POLICE STATION, PCR NO.262/2016 ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C., ANEKAL) VIDE ANNEXURE-B. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks time on the ground that the petitioners have taken back the file. This Court had granted time on the last date, subject to the condition that the petitioners pay cost of Rs.2,000/-. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20373 CRL.P No. 1276 of 2019 2. Therefore, the request for adjournment, is not justified. Hence, this petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. 3. Pending IAs, if any, shall stand dismissed. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE BKN/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5