HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12668 of 2026 Court No. - 72 HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J. 1. Supplementary affidavit, filed today, is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 3. The instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.732 of 2025, under Sections 115(2), 109(1), 351(3), 352 of the B.N.S., Police Station- Iglas, District- Aligarh, during the pendency of the trial. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant contends that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further contended that in the First Information Report (FIR), a general role of assaulting the injured with a knife has been attributed to three named accused persons and five unknown persons. Even in the statement of the injured, a similar version involving eight persons assaulting the injured has been brought forth. 5. Learned counsel further submits that the police have filed a charge sheet only against the applicant and co-accused Rahul, whereas the other named accused, Chandar, has been taken out of the investigation. It is also contended that the co-accused Rahul, after his arrest, led to the recovery of a knife and confessed to his involvement, stating therein that he was the one who assaulted the injured, while the co-accused had actually intended to assault one Rakesh Kumar Saxena. Learned counsel for the applicant further contends that in the statement of the eye-witnesses, who supposedly witnessed the incident, the role of assault has been attributed only to the co-accused Rahul and the applicant. The applicant has a criminal history of one other case, which was lodged after the registration Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ravi Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Netrapal @ Sunny .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) of the present case, being a case under the Arms Act, in which the applicant is yet to apply for bail. 6. The learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail. 7. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties. 8. The FIR has been lodged against eight persons, including three named accused and five unknown persons. The injured sustained six injuries in the incident. One of the injuries found on the person of the injured is s tated to be a stab wound, from which a part of the small intestine had started protruding. The doctor has opined the injuries to be grievous in nature. 9. However, in the statement of the injured as well as the FIR, no specific injury has been attributed to the applicant and only a general role has been assigned to him. There also appears to be a contradiction between the FIR version, the statement of the injured, who have assigned general role of assault and the statements of eye- witness, Amar Singh and Kasmira, who have attributed the role of assault only to the applicant and co-accused Rahul. 10. Nothing incriminating has been recovered at the pointing out or from the possession of the applicant. The knife is stated to have been recovered from co-accused Rahul. The applicant has no criminal antecedents and is in jail since 17.11.2025. A charge sheet has already been filed and the trial is not likely to conclude in the near future. 11. Taking into account the entire facts and circumstances of the case, as enumerated above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it appropriate to grant bail to the applicant. 12. Let the applicant - Netrapal alias Sunny, involved in the aforementioned crime be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Court concerned, subject to the following conditions: i. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence. ii. The applicant will not indulge in any criminal activity. iii. The applicant will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and co-operate in the trial. iv. The applicant will appear regularly on each and every date fixed by the BAIL No. 12668 of 2026 2 trial Court, unless his personal appearance is exempted by the Court concerned. 13. In the event of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the Court below will be at liberty to proceed to cancel his/her bail. 14. It is made clear that the applicant shall be released on the basis of computer generated copy of this order, downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad and verified by the concerned counsel with the undertaking that the certified copy will be filed within 15 days. 15. It is further directed that the trial court shall send the release order to the concerned jail through Bail Order Management System (BOMS) to ensure early release of the applicant. May 7, 2026 Kushal BAIL No. 12668 of 2026 3 (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.) Digitally signed by :- KUSHAL AGRAWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad