IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 134 CWP-21797-2026 Date of Decision:- 20.07.2026 SARVESH KUMAR ....Petitioner(s) Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASGURPREET SINGH PURI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Present: Mr. Shantanu Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner. * * * * SANJIV BERRY , J. 1. The present writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondent No.4 to execute and realize recovery certificate bearing Memo No.RERA/PB/Legal/AO/2026/4186 dated 20.03.2026 (Annexure P-12) issued in Execution Petition No.Ex/AO/13/2024 by respondent No.3 against the judgment and decree dated 17.10.2023 (Annexure P-3), in complaint No.AdC1395 of 2019 (Annexure P-1) in a time bound manner. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, restricted his prayer and submitted that the petitioner had moved a representation/reminder dated 29.05.2026 (Annexure P-14) to respondent No.4, but the same has not been considered and decided till date. He further submitted that at this stage, the petitioner would be satisfied in case the aforesaid representation/reminder dated 29.05.2026 (Annexure P-14) is considered and decided by respondent No.4 by passing a speaking order, in accordance with law, within a time bound manner. SANDAL SHARMA 2026.07.22 11:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CWP-21797-2026 -2- 3. Notice of motion. 4. On the asking of the Court, Ms. Shruti, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab accepted notice on behalf of respondents-State of Punjab and submitted that the aforesaid representation/reminder shall be considered and decided by passing a speaking order in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from today. 5. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances and without expressing anything on the merits of the case, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.4-Deputy Commissioner, SAS Nagar (Mohali) to consider and decide the representation/reminder dated 29.05.2026 (Annexure P-14) by passing a speaking order in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within a period of four weeks from today. The decision so taken be communicated to the petitioner as well. (SANJIV BERRY) (JASGURPREET SINGH PURI) JUDGE JUDGE 20.07.2026 S.Sharma i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No SANDAL SHARMA 2026.07.22 11:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment