D/L537 13.08.2026 Bpg. C.R.M. (A) 1698 of 2026 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Pukhuria Police Station Case No.452 of 2025 dated 12.09.2025 under Sections 126(2)/115(2)/117(2)/64(1)/62/109 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 read with Section 4 of POCSO Act; Shyamal Karmakar Versus The State of West Bengal & Anr. Mr. Apan Saha Mr. Musharraf Alam Sk Mr. Sk. Sarfaraj Nawaj Mr. Tasnim Ahmed. …for the petitioner. Mr. Sunil Gupta. …for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the Manager of the Bank who has been falsely implicated in the present case. Learned advocate for the State has produced the case diary. I have taken into account the statement of the victim under Section 183 of the BNSS as well as other witnesses. On an assessment of the same, I am of the opinion that this is not a fit case for granting anticipatory bail. Accordingly, CRM(A) 1698 of 2026 is dismissed. 2 All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)