04/08/2026 D/L – 851 Court No.35 S. Kundu Allowed C.R.M.(M) 1569 of 2026 In Re: An application for bail under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023. In connection with Magrahat P.S Case No. 251 of 2024 dated 06/07/2024 under Sections 126(2)/117(2)/103/3(5) of the BNS. In the matter of: Morjina Bibi @ marjina Sarkar …Petitioner. Md. Anwar Hossain Mr. Satadru Lahiri Ms. Benajir Hasna Mr. Aliul islam Mr. S. Haider …for the petitioner. Ms. Koel Mukherjee …for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for one year six months and till date 14 witnesses have been examined out of 22 witnesses cited by the prosecution. According to the petitioner, prosecution could not complete the number of witnesses as was proposed by this Court. Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail. I have taken into account the complicity of the present petitioner and I am of the opinion that the petitioner is similarly situated as the other accused persons, who have been granted bail. Having considered the same, I am of the opinion that further detention of the petitioner is unwarranted. 2 Thus, prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. Accordingly, the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.20,000/- with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- each, one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of learned ACJM, Diamond Harbour. If on bail, the petitioner shall be physically present on each and every date fixed before the learned Trial Court and shall not leave the jurisdiction of District South 24 Parganas without the prior permission of the learned Trial Court. Accordingly, CRM (M) 1569 of 2026 is allowed. Memo of evidence filed by the State is taken on record. All parties shall act on the basis of the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)