Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 32072 (ORI)

JIKURUN NESSAN v. DR.N THIRUMALA NAIK, IAS

CONTC/5029/2026 · 2026-08-21

Aditya Kumar Mohapatra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page 1 of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CONTC No.5029 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010498152026 Jikurun Nessan ..... Petitioner Represented by Adv. - Subhadutta Routray -versus- Dr.N Thirumala Naik, IAS and ors. ..... Opposite Parties Represented by Adv. – Mr. P. K. Mohanty, ASC CORAM: MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA ORDER 21.08.2026 Order No. 01. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Alleging willful and deliberate violation of this Court’s order dated 10.02.2022 passed in W.P.(OAC) No.3827 of 2014, the petitioner has approached this Court by filing the present CONTC application. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, contended that the order dated 10.02.2022 has already been confirmed by the Appellate Division Bench in Writ Appeal bearing W.A. No.487 of 2024 along with a batch of similar other writ appeals, disposed of vide a common order dated 23.02.2026. It is further contended that despite the said order having been confirmed by the Page 2 of 2. Appellate Division Bench, the opposite parties have not taken any step for implementation of the said order. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the opposite party- contemnors, on the other hand, contended that if some more time is granted to the opposite party-contemnors, necessary steps shall be taken to ensure that the order passed by this Court is implemented. 5. Considering such submissions, this CONTC application is disposed of by granting further six weeks’ time to the opposite party-contemnors to ensure that the order dated 10.02.2022 passed in W.P.(OAC) No.3827 of 2014 is implemented, failing which, the Opposite party-contemnors shall be asked to appear in person before this Court and to explain as to why a proceeding under the Contempt of Courts Act shall not be initiated against them for willful and deliberate violation of this Court’s order. 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the CONTC application is disposed of. (ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA) Judge Utkalika NAYAK Orissa, Cuttack Signature Not Verified