SANJOY BAIDYA @ ROY v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR
CRM(M)/1134/2026 · 2026-08-20
Tirthankar Ghosh
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 32070 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 32070 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
20.08.2026 Court No.35.
D/L. 41. Kausik (Rejected)
CRM (M) 1134 of 2026
In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with Chakdah Police Station Case No. 322 of 2026 dated 6th March, 2026 under Section 65(1) of the BNS, 2023 read with Section 4 of the POCSO Act, 2012.
And In the matter of : Sanjoy Baidya @ Roy
……Petitioner.
Mr. Shibaji Kr. Das
Mr. Dipendu Sarkar
Ms. Deblina De
Ms. Moitriye Das
……for the Petitioner.
Mr. Kalidas Saha
Ms. Nayana Mukhopadhyay
….for the State.
Petitioner is in custody since 6th March, 2026. Charge sheet has already been submitted, as such, learned advocate on medical grounds of the petitioner, prays for bail.
State has produced the case diary.
I have taken into account the materials appearing including the statement of the victim under Section 183 of the BNSS. Having considered the overall circumstances and the fact that the deposition of victim is yet to be conducted, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail at this stage.
2
Petitioner will renew his prayer for bail after the evidence of the victim is over.
Learned Trial Court would ensure that at least charges are framed and within a period of 2/3 months the evidence of the victim be concluded.
With the aforesaid observations CRM (M) 1134 of 2026 is dismissed.
Memo of Evidence submitted be kept with the record.
All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)