Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 32065 (MAD)

S.Pandikumar v. The District Collector

WP(MD)/9383/2026 · 2026-06-08

M Jothiraman, N Sathish Kumar

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P(MD)No.9383 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 08.06.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN W.P(MD)No.9383 of 2026 and W.M.P(MD)Nos.7501 & 7505 of 2026 S.Pandikumar ... Petitioner vs. 1.The District Collector, Theni District, Theni. 2.The Chief Educational Officer, Theni District at Theni. 3.The District Educational Officer, Theni District at Theni. 4.The Secretary, ZKM Higher Secondary School, Bodinayakanur, Theni District-625 513. 5.The Headmaster ZKM Higher Secondary School, Bodinayakanur, Theni District-625 513. ... Respondents 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.9383 of 2026 PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 2 & 3 to conduct proper enquiry against the fourth respondent school and to take the fourth respondent school under direct control and further to cancel the recognition as and grant under the Act. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Prabhu For R1 to R3 : Mr.C.Jeganathan Counsel for State For R4 : Mr.M.Ajmal Khan Senior Counsel for M/s.Ajmal Associates ORDER (Order of the Court was made by N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.) The petitioner has filed the present writ petition as a Public Interest Litigation alleging that the fourth and fifth respondent schools are collecting excess fees from the students. 2.Though certain documents have been relied upon by the petitioner, the genuineness of those documents is doubtful. Further, it is stated that representations were submitted to the authorities; however, no action has been taken regarding the alleged collection of excess fees. 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.9383 of 2026 3. The writ petition has been filed on the allegation that respondents 4 and 5 are collecting excess fees. However, no specific particulars or supporting materials have been furnished to substantiate the allegation. A Public Interest Litigation cannot be encouraged on the basis of vague and unsubstantiated averments, particularly when it appears to have been filed for some ulterior motive. 4.Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. [N.S.K.,J.] [M.J.R.,J.] 08.06.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes am 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.9383 of 2026 To 1.The District Collector, Theni District, Theni. 2.The Chief Educational Officer, Theni District at Theni. 3.The District Educational Officer, Theni District at Theni. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.9383 of 2026 N.SATHISH KUMAR , J. and M.JOTHIRAMAN , J. am ORDER MADE IN W.P(MD)No.9383 of 2026 DATED : 08.06.2026 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis