Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 32059 (PNJ)

MS SIDHI VINAYAK ENTERPRISES v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CWP/7078/2026 · 2026-07-20

Rohit Kapoor, To Be Nominated

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

133 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-7078-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 20th July, 2026. M/S. SIDHI VINAYAK ENTERPRISES .…...Petitioner(s) V/s STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ......Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR Present Mr. Aman Bansal, Advocate and Ms. Anjali Bansal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Saurabh Kapoor, Addl. A.G., Punjab. **** ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, A.C.J. (Oral) 1. Considering the fact that the impugned communication is only a notice issued to the petitioner in the form of DRC-01A and DRC-01 is yet to be issued, it is always open to the petitioner to respond to the such notice and clarify the factual inconsistency, if any. 2. At this stage, we are not required to entertain the present Writ Petition on the grounds set up therein, and the Writ Petition stands dismissed, accordingly. 3. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of accordingly. [ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA] ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE [ROHIT KAPOOR] JUDGE July 20, 2026 Ess Kay Whether speaking / reasoned : Yes / No Whether Reportable : Yes / No SURESH KUMAR 2026.07.21 17:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document