MD AAMIR @ MOHD AAMIR AND ORS. v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL
CRM (A)/1927/2026 · 2026-08-18
Ajay Kumar Gupta
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 32042 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 32042 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
18.08.2026 Sl.No. 7 Ct. 39 Allowed Amalranjan In The High Court At Calcutta Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Appellate Side
CRM (A) No. 1927 of 2026
In Re: An application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 corresponding under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 filed in connection with Taltala Women Police Station Case No. 05 of 2024 dated 19.05.2026 under Sections 85/ 316(2) /351(2)/ 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 3/ 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. -And-
In the matter of : Md. Aamir @ Mohd. Aamir & Ors. Mr. Imran Ali Ms. Ankita Bose ……..for the petitioners Mr. Suraj Mishra …for the State
1. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioner no. 1, who happens to be the husband of the de facto complainant, he does not wish to press this application for anticipatory bail. 2. As such the application for anticipatory bail in respect of petitioner no. 1- Md. Aamir @ Mohd Aamir, is, thus, dismissed as not pressed. 3. However, he prays for anticipatory bail of petitioner no. 2 (mother of Petitioner no. 1), petitioner no. 3, (sister of Petitioner no. 1) and petitioner no. 4, (maternal-aunt of Petitioner no. 1). They are falsely implicated in this case. 2 He prays for anticipatory bail on any terms and conditions. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail and produces the case diary. 5. Having heard the learned counsels for the respective parties and on perusal of the materials available on record as well as the case diary and considering the aforesaid facts, this court finds that this is a fit case for granting anticipatory bail to the petitioners as there is no need for custodial interrogation/detention. 6. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners, namely, 2. Mehar Jahan @ Meher Jahan Begum, 3. Roohi @ Ruhi Begum, and 4. Sarbar Begum @ Shameem jahan are allowed. 7. In the event of arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of the arresting officer on the terms and conditions as he deems fit and proper and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. corresponding to Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. 8.
In the event the petitioners fail to comply with any of the conditions mentioned above, the prosecution shall be at liberty to pray for cancellation of the anticipatory bail granted by this Court in accordance with law. 3
9. The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of. 10. All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this court. 11. Concerned Department is directed to supply certified copies of this order to the parties, if applied for, upon compliance of all necessary formalities. ( Ajay Kumar Gupta, J. )