IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 118 Vivek @ Vivek Sharma State of Haryana and other CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) 1. Constitution of India 07.07.2026 (Annexure P incorrect and perverse inasmuch as it proceedings on the wholly erroneous premise that the petitioner sought upgradation to the post of “Data En Operator (DEO)”, whereas the petitioner had only sought correction of the inadvertent clerical error in the Deployment Offer Letter dated (Annexure P records (Annexure P dated 02.04.2024 (Annexure P 2. interfere in the matter be permitted to withdraw the instant petition. 3. 4. 5. 20.07.2026 rishu IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP Date of Decision: Vivek @ Vivek Sharma Versus Haryana and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr.Aniket Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Addl. A.G., Haryana. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Prayer in the present writ petition Constitution of India is for quashing the impugned Speaking Order dated 07.07.2026 (Annexure P-7) passed by respondent No. 5 which is factually incorrect and perverse inasmuch as it proceedings on the wholly erroneous that the petitioner sought upgradation to the post of “Data En Operator (DEO)”, whereas the petitioner had only sought correction of the inadvertent clerical error in the Deployment Offer Letter dated (Annexure P-1) which correction stands e records (Annexure P-@) and the department’s own communication No. 1144 dated 02.04.2024 (Annexure P-3). After arguing for some time when this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that be permitted to withdraw the instant petition. Permitted to do so. Dismissed as withdrawn. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable PHHC011169502026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-21890-2026 Date of Decision: 20.07.2026 .… Petitioner .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr.Aniket Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Prayer in the present writ petition filed under Article 226 of the quashing the impugned Speaking Order dated 7) passed by respondent No. 5 which is factually incorrect and perverse inasmuch as it proceedings on the wholly erroneous that the petitioner sought upgradation to the post of “Data Entry Operator (DEO)”, whereas the petitioner had only sought correction of the inadvertent clerical error in the Deployment Offer Letter dated 26.08.2023 1) which correction stands established from the attendance @) and the department’s own communication No. 1144 when this Court is not inclined to , learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant petition. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No under Article 226 of the quashing the impugned Speaking Order dated 7) passed by respondent No. 5 which is factually incorrect and perverse inasmuch as it proceedings on the wholly erroneous ry Operator (DEO)”, whereas the petitioner had only sought correction of the 26.08.2023 stablished from the attendance @) and the department’s own communication No. 1144 when this Court is not inclined to he may RISHU KATARIA 2026.07.21 14:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.