Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3204 (UTT)

AARTIK v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/121/2026 · 2026-04-15

Rakesh Thapliyal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:UHC:2661 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPCRL No. 121 of 2026 Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Tajhar Qayyum, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. B.C. Joshi, learned A.G.A. with Ms. Rangoli Purohit, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner inform to this court that the investigation has been completed and the charge sheet has already been filed, as such, the instant writ petition is rendered infructuous. 4. Learned counsel for the State has no objection. 5. In such view of the matter, the instant writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 15.04.2026 Nahid 2026:UHC:2661