Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3204 (JHR)

RAJESHWAR PRASAD v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/798/2021 · 2026-04-07

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:9894 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 798 of 2021 …… Rajeshwar Prasad, aged about 69 years, S/o Late Ganesh Prasad Sinha, resident of Village+P.O.-Bambhai via Ushri, P.S.-District-Arwal(Bihar) presently residing at New Shaket Nagar, Hinoo, P.O. & P.S.-Doranda, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand. …. Petitioner(s) -VERSUS- 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. Shri Prashant Kumar, Secretary, Water Resources Department State of Jharkhand, having its office at Nepal House, P.O. & P.S.-Doranda, District-Ranchi. 3. Shri Surendra Kumar, Chief Engineer, Water Resources, (Minor Irrigation) Department, having its office at Abhiyantran Bhawan, Main Road, P.O.-G.P.O. & P.S. Daily Market, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand-834001. 4.Shri Tripurari Sharan, Chief Secretary State of Bihar, having office at New Secretariat Bailey Road, P.O.+P.S.- Punai Chack, District-Patna. 5.Shri Sanjeev Hans, Secretary, Water Resource Department State of Bihar, having its office at New Secretariat Bailey Road, P.O.+P.S. Punai Chack, District- Patna. 6.Accountant General, (A&E), Ranchi, officiating his office from, North Office Para, Doranda, Ranchi, Jharkhand. …..Opposite Party (s) …… CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Parth Jalan, Advocate Mr. Bajrang Kumar, Advocate For the Opp.-State : Mrs. Sweta Shukla, A.C. to AAG-II For the Accountant General: Mr. Sudarshan Shrivastava, Adv For the State of Bihar : Mr. Binit Chandra, A.C. to G.A-Bihar …… 27/07.04.2026 1. At the outset, learned counsel for the Accountant General submits that recently on 02.03.2026 the authorities have been issued for pension and gratuity for revised 2026:JHHC:9894 2 pension (PRE-2016 revision). The copy of the same is being taken on record. 2. Having regard to the aforesaid development, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the instant contempt application may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to raise any grievance, if so advised. 3. Accordingly, the instant contempt application stands disposed of. (Deepak Roshan, J) 07.04.2026 Amardeep/ Uploaded on 10.04.2026