1 CGHC010383052022 2026:CGHC:35925 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 8276 of 2022 1 - Dinesh Kumar Yadav S/o Late Shri B.R. Yadav Aged About 54 Years R/o Shri Hari Niwas, Raipur Road, Gobranawapara, P.S. Gobranawapara, Tehsil Abhanpur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Urban Administration And Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralay, Police Station And Post Rakhi, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Director Office Of Director, Department Of Urban Administration And Development, Indirawati Bhawan, 4th Floor, Police Station And Post Rakhi, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - Additional Director (Finance)/ 1st Emquiry Officer Office Of Director, Urban Administration And Development Department, Indirawati Bhawan, 4th Floor, Police Station And Post Rakhi, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh 4 - Joint Director/ 2nd Enquiry Officer Department Of Urban Administration And Development, Regional Office, R.D.A.Building, Near Bajrang Hotel, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 5 - Chief Municipal Officer (C M O)/ Presenting Officer Department Of Urban Administration And Development, Narharpur, District North Bastar (Kanker ) Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner/s : Shri Abhishek Pandey, Advocate alongwith Shri Rishabhdev Sahu, NIRMALA RAO 2 Advocate. For Respondents/State : Shri Amandeep Singh, P.L. For Respondent No.5 : Shri Aniket Verma, Advocate. Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 13/08/2026 1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- “(i) That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to produce all the relevant records relating to case of the petitioner before this Hon'ble Court for its kind perusal. (ii) That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash/set-aside the impugned show cause notice dated 13.09.2022 issued by Respondent No. 2 Director, Raipur to the petitioner (Annexure P/4). (iii) That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash / set-aside the whole departmental enquiry procedure against the petitioner. (iv) That this Hon'ble Court may further be pleased to direct respondents to give suitable compensation to the petitioner for the mental trauma and agony, harassment and hardships suffered by him as also cost of the litigation.” 2. Learned counsel appearing for the State would submit that the departmental enquiry has already been concluded and a final order has been passed by the disciplinary authority. 3. Having considered the aforesaid facts, in the opinion of this Court, the present petition has become infructuous. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to assail the final order passed in the departmental inquiry. 4. With the aforesaid observation(s), this writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Nimmi