CRWP-8517 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 120 BANSDEEP KAUR STATE OF CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: SURYA PARTA directions to the respondent 2. the petitione respondent No. No.2 to decide the abovementioned representation within 3. 8517-2026 (O&M) 8587 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH BANSDEEP KAUR & ANR. VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA Mr. Mohit Garg, Advocates for PARTAP SINGH, J (ORAL) The instant petition has been filed by the directions to the respondents No.1 to 3 to respondents No.4 to 11. The learned counsel representing the petitioner the petitioner No.1 has filed the representation respondent No.2. The learned counsel prays for directions to to decide the abovementioned representation within Notice of motion to respondents No.1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-8517-2026 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 20.07.2026 .....PETITIONER VERSUS .....RESPONDENT SURYA PARTAP SINGH for the petitioners. as been filed by the petitioners to protect their life and liberty from sel representing the petitioners submits that representation (Annexure P-5) before earned counsel prays for directions to the respondent to decide the abovementioned representation within the stipulated time. to respondents No.1 to 3. (O&M) 2026 .....PETITIONERS .....RESPONDENTS for from submits that before the respondent stipulated time. GAURAV THAKUR 2026.07.21 09:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-8517 upon the State 5. hereby disposed of with a direction to representation order within a period of 15 days from order. It is safety and security to clarified that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to threat perception to the petitioner police authority of independent decision on the issue of Gaurav Thakur Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 8517-2026 (O&M) 8587 upon the State is hereby dispensed with. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the representation of the petitioner No.1 (Annexure P within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of instant It is further directed that the petitioner safety and security to protect their life and liberty, if required. It is clarified that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to at perception to the petitioners or the validity of their marriage police authority of concerned District shall be at liberty to make independent assessment of the threat perception on the issue of providing adequate Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No 2 Hence service of notice Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is the respondent No.2 to decide the (Annexure P-5) by passing a speaking the date of receipt of copy of instant directed that the petitioners shall be provided requisite life and liberty, if required. It is however clarified that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to or the validity of their marriage. The District shall be at liberty to make threat perception to the petitioners, and take a adequate security to them. :Yes/No : Yes/No Hence service of notice Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is decide the by passing a speaking the date of receipt of copy of instant requisite however clarified that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to . The District shall be at liberty to make an and take a GAURAV THAKUR 2026.07.21 09:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document