- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010661892024 NC: 2026:KHC:38691 WP No. 33293 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO. 33293 OF 2024 (SCST) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. PUTTARAJU S/O MUNIVENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS R/AT NO.105, KOGILU VILLAGE YELAHANKA HOBLI YELAHANKA TALUK BENGALURU-560 064. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VARADARAJA P.N., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT M.S.BUILDING BENGALURU-560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT KANDAYA BHAVAN, K.G.ROAD BENGALURU-560 009. Digitally signed by GEETHA P G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010661892024 NC: 2026:KHC:38691 WP No. 33293 of 2024 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BANGALORE NORTH SUB-DIVISION BANGALORE-560 009. 4. THE TAHSILDAR BENGALURU NORTH (ADDL) TALUK, YELAHANKA BENGALURU-560 064. 5. SRI. MANJUNATH ALVA S/O SRI. ANAND ALVA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS RESIDING AT ALVA NILAYA MUDAYURU MANE PADUVANURU VILLAGE PUTTUR TALUK D.K.DISTRICT-574 223. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SAVITHRAMMA, AGA FOR R1 TO R4; SRI. VINOD KUMAR M., ADVOCATE FOR R5) THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 14.08.2023 IN CASE NO.KSCST(A) 32/2019 PASSED BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT, AT BENGALURU, A COPY OF WHICH IS PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-D AND ALLOW THE RESUMPTION APPLICATION AS PRAYED FOR AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010661892024 NC: 2026:KHC:38691 WP No. 33293 of 2024 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN ORAL ORDER 1. None appears for the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 09.09.2025 stating that the petitioner has taken back all the papers/documents along with no objection to engage another advocate. It is seen that the petitioner has not engaged any other advocate and nobody appears for the petitioner. 3. It appears that petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition and the same is accordingly dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE PGG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9